Europe PMC is an archive of life sciences journal literature. Results: Programming a LINAC Data Capture System. To illustrate the use of the model in practice, we will apply some object-oriented design principles used in the construction of a data capture system on a clinical linear accelerator (LINAC) in the radiation oncology department.

Issuu is a digital publishing platform that makes it simple to publish magazines, catalogs, newspapers, books, and more online. Easily share your publications and get them in front of Issuu’s.
Reverse-engineered HLDS. Contribute to dreamstalker/rehlds development by creating an account on GitHub.
Cbeam 2002 3/11/2015 10:44 Span No. 1 Location Shear Moment Defl. 2 Location Shear Moment Defl. 3 Location Shear Moment Defl. 4 Location Shear.
Trusted Windows (PC) download CBeam 2.0. Virus-free and 100% clean download. Get CBeam alternative downloads.

CAESAR: Competition for Authenticated Encryption: Security, Applicability, and Robustness (2014), http://competitions.cr.yp.to/caesar.html
Whiting, D., Housley, R., Ferguson, N.: AES Encryption and Authentication Using CTR Mode and CBC-MAC. IEEE 802.11-02/001r2 (2002)Google Scholar
Rogaway, P., Bellare, M., Black, J., Krovetz, T.: OCB: a block-cipher mode of operation for efficient authenticated encryption. In: Reiter, M.K., Samarati, P. (eds.) ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 196–205. ACM (2001)Google Scholar
Rogaway, P.: Efficient instantiations of tweakable blockciphers and refinements to modes OCB and PMAC. In: Lee, P.J. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3329, pp. 16–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krovetz, T., Rogaway, P.: The software performance of authenticated-encryption modes. In: Joux, A. (ed.) FSE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6733, pp. 306–327. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellare, M., Rogaway, P., Wagner, D.: The EAX mode of operation. In: Roy, B., Meier, W. (eds.) FSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3017, pp. 389–407. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoni, G., Daemen, J., Peeters, M., Van Assche, G.: Sponge functions. In: ECRYPT Hash Function Workshop (2007)Google Scholar
Bertoni, G., Daemen, J., Peeters, M., Van Assche, G.: On the security of the keyed sponge construction. In: Symmetric Key Encryption Workshop (SKEW 2011) (2011)Google Scholar
Bertoni, G., Daemen, J., Peeters, M., Van Assche, G.: Duplexing the sponge: Single-pass authenticated encryption and other applications. In: Miri, A., Vaudenay, S. (eds.) SAC 2011. LNCS, vol. 7118, pp. 320–337. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumasson, J., Jovanovic, P., Neves, S.: NORX v1 (2014), Submission to CAESAR competitionGoogle Scholar
Dobraunig, C., Eichlseder, M., Mendel, F., Schläffer, M.: Ascon v1 (2014), Submission to CAESAR competitionGoogle Scholar
Minaud, B.: Re: CBEAM Withdrawn as of today! (2014), CAESAR mailing listGoogle Scholar
Saarinen, M.: CBEAM r1 (2014), Submission to CAESAR competitionGoogle Scholar
Saarinen, M.: CBEAM: Efficient authenticated encryption from feebly one-way φ functions. In: Benaloh (ed.) [9], pp. 251–269Google Scholar
Morawiecki, P., Gaj, K., Homsirikamol, E., Matusiewicz, K., Pieprzyk, J., Rogawski, M., Srebrny, M., Wójcik, M.: ICEPOLE v1 (2014), Submission to CAESAR competitionGoogle Scholar
Bertoni, G., Daemen, J., Peeters, M., Van Assche, G., Van Keer, R.: Keyak v1 (2014), Submission to CAESAR competitionGoogle Scholar
Andreeva, E., Bilgin, B., Bogdanov, A., Luykx, A., Mendel, F., Mennink, B., Mouha, N., Wang, Q., Yasuda, K.: PRIMATEs v1 (2014), Submission to CAESAR competitionGoogle Scholar
Saarinen, M.: Beyond modes: Building a secure record protocol from a cryptographic sponge permutation. In: Benaloh (ed.) [9], pp. 270–285Google Scholar
Saarinen, M.: STRIBOB r1 (2014), Submission to CAESAR competitionGoogle Scholar
Saarinen, M.: Authenticated encryption from GOST R 34.11-2012 LPS permutation. In: CTCrypt 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
Alizadeh, J., Aref, M., Bagheri, N.: Artemia v1 (2014), Submission to CAESAR competitionGoogle Scholar
Gligoroski, D., Mihajloska, H., Samardjiska, S., Jacobsen, H., El-Hadedy, M., Jensen, R.: π-Cipher v1 (2014), Submission to CAESAR competitionGoogle Scholar
Bellare, M., Namprempre, C.: Authenticated encryption: Relations among notions and analysis of the generic composition paradigm. J. Cryptology 21(4), 469–491 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Iwata, T., Ohashi, K., Minematsu, K.: Breaking and repairing GCM security proofs. In: Safavi-Naini, R., Canetti, R. (eds.) CRYPTO 2012. LNCS, vol. 7417, pp. 31–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoni, G., Daemen, J., Peeters, M., Van Assche, G.: Sponge-based pseudo-random number generators. In: Mangard, S., Standaert, F.-X. (eds.) CHES 2010. LNCS, vol. 6225, pp. 33–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellare, M., Rogaway, P.: The security of triple encryption and a framework for code-based game-playing proofs. In: Vaudenay, S. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4004, pp. 409–426. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreeva, E., Bilgin, B., Bogdanov, A., Luykx, A., Mennink, B., Mouha, N., Yasuda, K.: APE: Authenticated permutation-based encryption for lightweight cryptography. In: Cid, C., Rechberger, C. (eds.) FSE. LNCS. Springer (2014)Google Scholar
Jovanovic, P., Luykx, A., Mennink, B.: Beyond 2^c/2 security in sponge-based authenticated encryption modes. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2014/373 (2014), Full version of this paperGoogle Scholar
Wu, H.: The Hash Function JH (2011) Submission to NIST’s SHA-3 competitionGoogle Scholar
Bagheri, N.: Padding of Artemia (2014), CAESAR mailing listGoogle Scholar
Benaloh, J. (ed.): CT-RSA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8366. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Cbeam 2002 Software Downloads

DEVELOPER :Mcal Software

PLATFORM :Windows

LICENSE :Trial

C-beam is a continuous beam software package that allows the user to solve statically indeterminate structures. The application uses a stiffness matrix method of analysis to calculate analytical results accurately and precisely. Cbeam is a powerful timesaving tool for engineers and designers, which makes the calculation of Reactions, Deflections, Shear and Moments extremely easy, accurate, fast, and user friendly. The modeling of multiple span elements of varying elasticity with uniform, distributed, and concentrated load applications along with a variety of support condition is in the hands of the user.

Key Features

Cbeam offers graphical interface and is totally interactive
Cbeam initializes with a stability check before the analysis, and therefore no need to worry about crashing
Varying elasticity values for material selections a